csi

My name is Detective Brent. Two weeks ago I was called to a crime scene a 2 bedroom 1 bathroom beach house. The alleged victom was felix navadah. (What other information about Felix can you share?) The suspect is guilty of committing this crime is kendra goode because i have a lot of evidence. (What was the motive?) This suspect's guilt was confirmed through the testing and results of evidence collected at the crime scene.

The most incriminating piece of evidence was her fingerprints on felixs cup. The evidence was found on felixs cup in scene 3. The test performed was Fingerprint. The results of the test were kendras finger prints on felixs cup. This connects the suspect to the crime because kendra could of put something in the cup that would make him die.

The next piece of evidence collected was the fake letter. It was found in a notepad in scene 8. The test performed was a Ph.test (Handwriting analysis) The results of the test was a letter wrote ny kendra but she framed vera and said love vera at the end of the letter. This connects the suspect to the crime because she could of wrote the to frame vera so she doesnt get in trouble.

Another piece of evidence collected was the cola test. It was found at scene 2. The test performed was ph test. The results of the test were it was acid in felixs cup (regular cola is an acid...his was a base!) so kendra must of puy something in the cup. This connects the suspect to the crime because kendra probibly put something in felixs cup

The last piece of evidence collected was the ice cube test. It was found at scene 7. The test performed was (Ph test The results of the test was that ice water was acid (The water in the ice cube tray was a base and regular water is a neutral) . This connects the suspect to the crime because kendra pobily did something to the ice cube.

According to the evidence, the following is an account of the events believed to have gone down on that fateful day. gene went to sleep kendra took a shower alfrado was with felix and vera was walking. (How and when did the poisoning take place?)

Therefore, kendra goode committed the crime of felixs murder for piosining his cola she is surving live in jail

**Rubric for Podcasts** introduction. Provides relevant information and establishes a clear purpose engaging the listener immediately. || Describes the topic and engages the audience as the introduction proceeds. || Somewhat engaging (covers well-known topic), and provides a vague purpose. || Irrelevant or inappropriate topic that minimally engages listener. Does not include an introduction or the purpose is vague and unclear. ||^  ||
 * ** CATEGORY ** || ** Exemplary **  || ** Proficient **  || ** Partially Proficient **  || ** Incomplete **  || ** POINTS **  ||
 * ** Introduction ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || Catchy and clever
 * ^  || Tells who is speaking, date the podcast was produced, and where the speaker is located.  || Tells most of the following: who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Alludes to who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Speaker is not identified. No production date or location of the speaker is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Content ** || ** 6 points ** || ** 4 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || The motive was detailed and clearly based on information delivered throughout the investigation.  || The motive is detailed and based on partial information delivered throughout the investigation.  || The motive is not very detailed and is sprinkled with inaccurate information.  || __** The motive is missing, or unclear or all information is inaccurate.  **__ ||^   ||
 * ^  || Four pieces of strong evidence were presented and linked to the suspect in an organized, methodical manner.  || Three or four pieces of evidence were presented and/or linked to the suspect in a somewhat organized, thoughtful manner.  || __**Two pieces of shaky evidence were presented and/or loosely linked to the suspect. Lack of organization**__.  || One to no pieces of unimportant evidence were presented in an unorganized manner.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || The events in the scenario are detailed, extremely organized and strongly supported with evidence and facts related to the crime scene.  || The events in the scenario are well organized, somewhat detailed, and supported with evidence from the crime scene. || __** The events in the crime scene lack organization, detail, and are weakly supported with evidence from the crime scene. **__ || There was no clear direction and evidence was unimportant. ||^   ||
 * ^  || Conclusion clearly summarizes key information.  || Conclusion summarizes information.  || **__Conclusion vaguely summarizes key information__**  || No conclusion is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Delivery ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 point ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || Well rehearsed, smooth delivery in a conversational style.  || Rehearsed, smooth delivery.  || Appears unrehearsed with uneven delivery.  || Delivery is hesitant, and choppy and sounds like the presenter is reading.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Highly effective enunciation and presenter's speech is clear and intelligible, not distant and muddled. Expression, and rhythm keep the audience listening. || Enunciation, expression, pacing are effective throughout the podcast.  || Enunciation, expression, rhythm are sometimes distracting during the podcast.  || Enunciation of spoken word is distant and muddled and not clear. Expression and rhythm are distracting throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Correct grammar is used throughout the podcast.  || Correct grammar is used during most of the podcast.  || Occasionally incorrect grammar is used during the podcast.  || Poor grammar is used throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ** Graphic and Music Enhancements ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || Music enhances the mood, quality, and understanding of the presentation.  || Music provides supportive background to the podcast.  || Music provides somewhat distracting background to the podcast.  || Music is distracting to presentation.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || All music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared with appropriate documentation.  || Music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared.  || Use of copyrighted works is questionable.  || Copyright infringement is obvious.  ||^   ||
 * ** Technical Production ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment without background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment with minimal background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a semi-quiet environment with some background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a noisy environment with constant background noise and distractions.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Transitions are smooth and spaced correctly without noisy, dead space.  || Transitions are smooth with a minimal amount of ambient noise.  || Transitions are uneven with inconsistent spacing; ambient noise is present.  || Transitions are abrupt and background noise needs to be filtered.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Volume of voice, music, and effects enhance the presentation.  || Volume is acceptable.  || Volume is occasionally inconsistent.  || Volume changes are highly distracting.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Podcast length keeps the audience interested and engaged.  || Podcast length keeps audience listening.  || Podcast length is somewhat long or somewhat short to keep audience engaged.  || Podcast is either too long or too short to keep the audience engaged.  ||^   ||
 * ** TOTAL POINTS ** || /57  ||